Demographic Factors of Corruption Perception: The Influence of Gender, Age, and Education in Slovenia

Authors

  • Mitja Pust PhD student at the Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, University of Novo Mesto
  • Karmen Erjavec University of Novo mesto, Faculty of Economics and Informatics https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-0292

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55707/eb.v12i2.155

Keywords:

corruption, demographic factors, corruption perception, gender, age, education, Slovenia

Abstract

Corruption represents one of the key obstacles to the development of societies and economies, yet demographic factors often remain overlooked when analysing its causes. The purpose of this paper is to examine how gender, age, and education influence the perception of corruption among the Slovenian citizens. Based on a quantitative descriptive study conducted on a sample of 425 Slovenian residents, statistically significant differences were identified between different demographic groups. The results indicate that men, more than women, perceive gender, ethnicity, and education as influential factors and demonstrate greater tolerance toward corrupt practices. Age-related differences reveal that both younger and older respondents attribute greater importance to gender and ethnicity than the middle-aged population. Furthermore, education plays a significant role in shaping corruption perceptions: respondents with lower educational attainment identify not only gender and ethnicity but also education and income as key factors. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the social determinants of corruption perception and provide an empirical basis for the development of targeted and demographically sensitive anti-corruption measures.

References

Blesse, S. in Roesel, F. (2021). Accountability and corruption: Evidence from a natural experiment. European Journal of Political Economy, 66, 101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101980

Delavallade, C., Gauri, V. in Keefer, P. (2023). Promoting integrity and anti-corruption through education: Evidence from a randomized intervention. World Development, 162, 106111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106111

Domadenik, P., Prašnikar, J. in Svejnar, J. (2014). The impact of corruption on managerial decision-making: Evidence from Slovenian firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.08.001

European Commission. (2024). Rule of law report 2024 – Country chapter on the rule of law situation in Slovenia. https://commission.europa.eu

Fürstenberg, F., Müller, T. in Lutz, R. (2023). Who tolerates corruption? The impact of socio-economic status and political attitudes. Social Indicators Research, 170(2), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03044-6

Giannoulakis, A., Lavdas, K. in Ladi, S. (2024). Anti-corruption strategies in democratic societies: Institutional trust and demographic variance. Journal of Public Policy, 44(1), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000188

Hansen, H. K. in Flyverbom, M. (2023). Demographic inequalities and digital corruption monitoring: A critical perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2085445

Jones, C. M. in Edewor, A. (2023). Gendered perceptions of corruption: Empirical evidence from cross-cultural contexts. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 64(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152231173265

Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije. (2010). Zakon o integriteti in preprečevanju korupcije (ZIntPK). Uradni list Republike Slovenije, št. 45/10 s spremembami. https://www.kpk-rs.si

Martínez, F. in Diaz, R. (2024). Generational differences in attitudes toward corruption: A comparative EU study. Ethics & Behavior, 34(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2023.2235092

Ministrstvo za pravosodje Republike Slovenije. (2001). Obligacijski zakonik (OZ). Uradni list Republike Slovenije, št. 83/01 s spremembami. https://www.uradni-list.si

OECD. (2018). OECD integrity review of Argentina: Achieving integrity for sustainable development. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264291650-en

Pellegata, A. in Memoli, V. (2022). Citizens’ perceptions of public integrity and the role of education and media exposure. Governance, 35(3), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12568

Rose-Ackerman, S. in Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962933

Skinner, C. (2020). Survey methodology in political research. V G. R. Newman (ur.), Handbook of social research methodology (str. 231–248). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526470360

Sundström, A. in Wängnerud, L. (2016). Corruption and the role of women in the bureaucracy (QoG Working Paper Series 2016:20). University of Gothenburg. https://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1602/1602704_2016_20_sundstrom_w--ngnerud.pdf

Thomann, E. (2025). Corruption as a systemic problem: Perspectives from political sociology. Policy Studies Journal, 53(1), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12412

Transparency International. (2013). Corruption perceptions index 2013. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2013

Transparency International. (2022). Corruption perceptions index 2021. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021

Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023

UNODC. (2021). Education for justice: Module 5 – Corruption in the private sector. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/anti-corruption/module-5/index.html

UNODC. (2023). The time is now: Addressing gender dimensions in corruption. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/documents/research

UNODC. (2024). Corruption, gender and sustainable development: Trends and policy responses. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/corruption/publications.html

University of Ljubljana. (2023). 1KA – One Click Survey. Center for Social Informatics. https://www.1ka.si

Vitolla, F., Rubino, M., Raimo, N. in Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M. (2023). Demographic determinants and perceptions of corruption: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(2), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05315-0

You, J. (2024). Education and anti-corruption: Long-term evidence from public sector accountability. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13555

Zulqarnain, M., Saeed, A. in Zafar, M. (2022). Measuring corruption perception through socio-demographic predictors: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 24(3), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-022-00185-3

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Pust, M., & Erjavec, K. (2025). Demographic Factors of Corruption Perception: The Influence of Gender, Age, and Education in Slovenia. Journal of Economic and Business Sciences, 12(2), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.55707/eb.v12i2.155

Issue

Section

Articles