Intellectual Autonomy – Meta-Component in Descriptors Defining Levels in the European Qualification Framework

Authors

  • Grozdana Gojkov
  • Aleksandar Stojanović
  • Aleksandra Gojkov-Rajić

Keywords:

intellectual autonomy, meta-components of European Qualification Framework

Abstract

Descriptors of the European Qualifications Framework expect from higher education didactics to develop models oriented towards critical thinking, i.e. intellectual autonomy, or critical and scientific education, whereas its theoretical frame involves emancipatory didactics grounded on conceptual changes of pluralistic concepts in contemporary philosophy of science and knowledge. The intentions of the paper are in line with the aforementioned, and it is an attempt to consider the reaches of implementation of the elements of the Bologna process from the standpoint of the autonomy of a university according to a special aspect – the freedom and responsibilities of the university in the function of the development of critical reasoning of students. Structures of meta-cognitive abilities of students are observed, as well as the strategies of learning and critical thinking, as significant indicators of the intellectual autonomy of students. It is an explorative research, aiming at testing the thesis on poor intellectual autonomy of students.

References

Babić-Kekez, S. (2009). Obrazovne potrebe u funkciji razvoja kompetencija za odgovornim roditeljstvom. Vršac: Visoka škola strukovnih studija za obrazovanje vaspitača “Mihailo Palov”.

Benson, P. (2001). Treaching and researching autonomy in language, learning. London: Longman.

Dam, L. (1995). Learner Autonomy 3: From Theory to Classroom practice. Dublin: Authentim.

Gojkov, G. (2005). Metateorijske koncepcije pedagoške metodologije: Uvod u pedagošku metodologiju. Vršac: Viša škola za obrazovanje vaspitača.

Gojkov, G. (2007). Didaktika i postmoderna. Vršac: VŠV.

Gojkov, G. (2013). Fragmenti visokoškolske didaktike. Vršac: Visoka vaspitačka škola “M. Palov”.

Gojkov, G. i Stojanović, A. (2011). Participativna epistemologija u didaktici. Vršac: VVŠ.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Jacobs, G. M. and Farrell, T. S. (2001). Paradigm Shift: Understanding and Implementing Change in Second Language Education. Retrieved 01 01, from TESL-EJ: Teashing Englisch as a second or foreing language. Spletna stran: http://teslej.org/ej17/a1.html.

Kostić, N. (1997). Prolegomena sociologije razaranja uma. Inovacije u nastavi, br. 4-5.

Kruse, O. (2011). Kritično razmišljanje u znaku Bologne: Retorika i realnost, u: Monika Rumller. Berlin: Neue impulse in Hochschuldidaktik.

Lalić-Vučetić, N., Đerić, I. in Devica, R. (2009). Samostojnost učencev in interpersobnalni stil učiteljev v teoriji samoodločbe listu. Beograd: Inštituta za raziskovanje v izobraževanju.

Lalović, Z. (2011). Metode učenja-nastave u školi. Naša škola. Podgorica: Zavod za školstvo Črne Gore.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Gojkov, G., Stojanović, A., & Gojkov-Rajić, A. (2022). Intellectual Autonomy – Meta-Component in Descriptors Defining Levels in the European Qualification Framework. Journal of Economic and Business Sciences, 1(2), 93–108. Retrieved from https://www.eb-nm.si/index.php/EB/article/view/95

Issue

Section

Articles