Guidelines on Evaluation of the European Cohesion Policy

Authors

  • Stanko Trček

Keywords:

European cohesion policy, evaluation of policy effects, theory-based evaluation, realist evaluation

Abstract

The European Commission provides legal bases that impose monitoring and implementation of cohesion policy. Evaluation is a process that runs through all the phases of cohesion policy implementation. The Commission has issued the EVALSED instructions and recommendations detailing the methods, concepts and methodology of monitoring and evaluation. These instructions assume the theory-based evaluation and evaluation by methods based on the assessment of the causal effect. The theory-based evaluation follows the intervention logic, identifies the causal links and the mechanisms of the change. It answers the questions why and how the intervention works. The approach based on the assessment of the causal effect answers the following questions: if the intervention works, whether there is a causal link, and how big the impact of the intervention is. This article presents the realist evaluation approach which falls within the group of theory-based evaluations. The realist evaluation highlights four related concepts that are helpful in interpretation and understanding of the programmes. These concepts are: mechanism, context, outcome and outcome pattern.

References

European Commission (2013a). EVALSED GUIDE, the resource for the evaluation of socioeconomic development.

European Commission (2013b). EVALSED SOURCEBOOK, method and techniques.

European Commission (2014). Guidance document on monitoring and evaluation, the programming period 2014–2020.

European Commission (2015). Monitoring and evaluation of European cohesion policy, guidance document on evaluation plans, terms of reference for impact evaluations guidance on quality management of external evaluations.

European Commission (2012). Design and commissioning of counterfactual impact evaluations, a practical guidance for ESF managing authority.

Evropska unija (2010). Peto poročilo o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji. Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije.

Evropski parlament (2013). UREDBA (EU) št. 1303/2013. Uredba o skupnih določbah skladov ESIF.

Gertier, E. (2011). Impact evaluation in practice. Washington D. C.: The World Bank.

Institute of Education sciences. (26. 5. 2016). What works Clearinghouse. Retieved on 6/5/2016 from the Internet: http://www.w-w-c.org.

Leeuw, L. F. (2011). On the effects, lack of effects and pervese effects of performance audit, performance auditing: contributing to accountability in democratic government. Cheltenham (UK): E. Elgar.

Lobe, B. (2006). Združevanje kvalitativnih in kvantitativnih metod – stara praksa v novi preobleki? Družboslovne razprave, str. 55–73.

Michalek, J. (2012). Counterfactual impact evaluation of EU rural development pragrammes - Propensity Score Matching methodology applied to selected EU Member States. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. European Commission - Joint Research Centre.

Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE.

Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (2004). Realist evaluation. Paper for British Cabinet Office.

Stryczynski, K. (2009). Rigorous impact evaluation: the magic bullet for evaluation of cohesion policy? European Commission.

SVRK (2015). Načrt vrednotenja izvajanja operativnega programa evropske kohezijske politike v Sloveniji v obdobju 2014–2020.

The Campbell Collaboration. Pridobljeno dne 10. 6. 2016 s svetovnega spleta: http://www.campbellcollaboration.org.

Treasury Board of Canada (2012). Theory-based approaches to evaluation concepts and practice. Retieved on 6/5/2016 from the Internet: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca.

Weiss, C. (1987). The circuitry of enlightement. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation, pp. 274–281.

Published

2022-04-01

How to Cite

Trček, S. (2022). Guidelines on Evaluation of the European Cohesion Policy. Journal of Economic and Business Sciences, 3(2), 3–19. Retrieved from https://www.eb-nm.si/index.php/EB/article/view/59

Issue

Section

Articles